Monday
28Sep2009

XBOX 360 Graphics Problem

I have an Xbox 360 and have had it for a couple of years and never have had a problem at all. I was slightly worried I might have an early Xbox and suffer from the red ring of death but as it turns out I have the Jasper model and as such am free of the worry.

I recently purchased an Onkyo TX SR507 AV set with all the surround sound speakers. I was pretty stoked and couldn’t wait to get this all setup and running, also I wanted to see how my Xbox would sound with all my new gadge. So I connected the Xbox to the Onkyo using the HDMI cable I got with it. I then connected the Onkyo to the TV via the TV out port using a 3m HDMI cable. My TV is up on the wall and all my gadgets and consoles are on a unit next to the TV.

Well when I powered on the gear I got no display or sound whatsoever on the TV, just a message saying “no signal” this caused me some concern. So I tried different cables from the Xbox to AV set. No difference, I was beginning to get a little frustrated so I thought “ I know, maybe I screwed up a setting on my AV when I’ve been setting it up” so I did a system reset and set it up all up from scratch again……

This also did not solve my problem. So this time I plugged the Xbox directly into the TV using the long lead that was in the TV out on the AV set. Well, what happened was that I was presented with a flickering display, red dots and red lines all over the screen. At first I thought I may have the start of the E75 error and believed my Xbox to be on its way out. But then I thought, maybe it’s the HDMI cable, maybe it’s not what I thought I had bought and that it isn’t 1080P compatible. So I navigated my way to the system settings and then display settings and changed to 1080i. Well what do you know, it cleared it up a treat. Crystal clear display. So after all that faffing it was the lead to the TV. At least that’s not as expensive to replace if I want to get 1080P back in play.

I hope this helps anyone else that has a similar issue to me.

Monday
21Sep2009

Mashup and Mixing away.... 

I have to say ive always loved this style of music ever since i was young kid playing around with twin tape decks, then when i got my Atari ST I used to mess around trying to splice two songs together. Its since got a lot easier to do and has become more popular. Although not too popular, as that would take something away from it.

 

Heres a few of my current favourites

Evelyn Champagne King vs. Kid Cudi - Shame (At Night)

Nelly Furtado vs MJ

Snow Patrol vs The Police

General Public vs Rihanna

John Williams vs Chemical Brothers

Snoop Dogg vs Led Zeppelin

Bodyrockers vs. Oakenfold (Cheekyboy remix)

Jennifer Lopez vs. TLC vs. Missy Elliott vs. Bodyrockers

 

Friday
11Sep2009

Killer Biscuits

I was surfing the web, like i do most lunch times and i found this article on the risks biscuits pose to our health. Not the normal risk as in weight gain or additives and E numbers but physical injuries incurred by people while eating a biscuit..... Can biscuits kill?

A disturbing probe into the potential for apparently innocent biscuits' ability to do harm has revealed that an astounding 25 million Brits have been injured while indulging in some light coffee/tea break snack action, with 500 victims requiring hospital treatment.

That's according to research outfit Mindlab International, which determined that almost a third of adults had been scalded by hot beverages while dunking, 26 per cent had choked on crumbs and ten per cent had broken a tooth or filling while getting their laughing gear round a biscuit.

Rather more seriously, seven per cent of Britons have dropped a biscuit tin on their foot, three per cent have fallen off a chair reaching for vital nourishment, and an equal percentage have poked themselves in the eye with a biscuit.

Seven per cent admitted to have been bitten while feeding a tasty biscuit morsel to a pet or “other wild animal”. The most extreme example of biscuit-related mishap, however, was the case of the man who got stuck in wet concrete after wading in to retrieve a stray biccy.

Mindlab also carried out a "Biscuit Injury Threat Evaluation" (BITE) to determine which was Blighty's deadliest biscuit. Mindlab International director Dr David Lewis explained: “We tested the physical properties of 15 popular types of biscuits, along with aspects of their consumption such as ‘dunkability’ and crumb dispersal.

“Then one of our mathematicians correlated these findings with research data and responses from a nationwide survey of 1,000 adults.”

The chilling result is that the public would do well to eye the Custard Cream with suspicion, since it topped the list with a BITE risk rating of 5.63. That's compared with 4.34 for your common-or-garden Cookie, in second spot, and 4.12 for next-placed Choc Biscuit Bar.

Those of you who like sucking a Ginger Nut will be relieved to learn that they're relatively risk-free, rating 2.99 in ninth place. Anyone not wanting to chance their arm should stick to Jaffa Cakes, since they bottomed the list with an almost harmless 1.16.

Mike Driver, marketing director for biscuit manufacturers Rocky, which commissioned the survey, concluded: “Working with biscuits every day, we’d long suspected they’re not as innocent as they look - and we were right."

Here's the full biscuit risk rating listing:

  • Custard Cream: 5.64
  • Cookie: 4.34
  • Choc Biscuit Bar: 4.12
  • Wafer: 3.74
  • Rich Tea: 3.45
  • Bourbon: 3.44
  • Oat Biscuit: 3.31
  • Digestive: 3.14
  • Ginger Nut: 2.99
  • Shortbread: 2.90
  • Caramel Shortcake: 2.76
  • Nice Biscuit: 2.27
  • Iced Biscuits/Party Rings: 2.16
  • Chocolate Finger: 1.38
  • Jaffa Cakes: 1.16
  •  

    Sunday
    06Sep2009

    District 9 The Review

    This evening i went to see this movie with my fiancée and some friends (they will love that) after watching some of the trailers on various video sharing sites and was hoping the movie wouldn't let me down.

    Well, for me it didn't let me down. Another reason which makes it stand out is that it is obviously a big budget movie but doesn't take place in the United States which must be a first for the Hollywood movie moguls. But the actual setting is in Johannesburg and tells of a group of aliens who become stranded on earth when their ship runs out of fuel and becomes disabled.
     
    The film then flicks in and out of a pseudo documentary style as footage from news feeds, security cameras, and cameras are used to set all the events and also introduce the main character of the film, Wikus Van De Merwe who is an employee of the Multi Nations United (MNU) which is a private security firm which is in charge of overseeing the aliens and keeping them under control.
     
    While much of this is to keep the public’s fear and disdain for the aliens they derogatorily call “Prawns” as they look like 7ft shrimps at bay. The true motive of the MNU is to unlock the secrets of the alien’s technology specifically their advanced weaponry.


     
    The alien weaponry cannot be used by humans as only the aliens genetic signatures can enable the weapons to fire, and as such, 20 years after the arrival of the aliens, the MNU is still unable to take advantage of the new technology.
     
    The crux of the films details Wikus’s promotion to lead a massive relocation of the aliens from their shanty town in District 9 to a more remote location that will better allow the creatures to remain removed from the disdainful locals.


     
    While the relocation of the aliens is forceful, the MNU attempts to appease international community and alien rights advocates by requiring the aliens to consent to the relocation to District 10. The fact that this is done at gunpoint is of no consequence to the MNU as the staff and soldiers show utter disdain for the aliens and even resort to such drastic actions as arbitrarily destroying a nest of their eggs in order to keep their population under control.
     
    During the relocation process, Wikus is clearly enjoying his new position and the status of being the focal point of the documentary. As he attempts to show off some contraband to the camera crew, he is exposed to a dark liquid substance that starts to alter his DNA.
     
    In less than 24hrs, Wikus goes from a mild mannered husband and company man to the most wanted man in the world, when it is discovered his DNA is starting to change into alien DNA which allows him to operate the alien weaponry.
     
    Wikus is exposed to the true nature of the MNUand his father in law, and seeks refuge in District 9 where he allies with an alien in an effort to regain his lost humanity. Along the way, his viewpoints change and he suddenly realises the need to help the aliens. 
     
    “District 9” begins in “Cloverfield” faux-reality-programming style with those shaky-cam shots, talking heads and a mix of real news footage of apartheid-related strife mixed with new footage of alien refugee strife.

    But when it gets going, once Wikus goes on the run from killer government agents and hooks up with a brilliant prawn scientist (Jason Cope) and his mischievous son, it’s a ride and a half and definitely not for the squeamish. In “District 9,” human actors and CGI characters interact like never before.

    The film is a smart mix of action, science fiction, and social commentary as the obvious parallels to Apartheid are clear in the film. The characters are interesting and the film cleverly mixes humor in with the social commentary without hitting you over the head with it. I would certainly recommend seeing this movie to friends.

    Friday
    04Sep2009

    Its Alive!

    Finally after 2 days my domain has mapped successfully to where you find it now. I was worried at first thinking i had been sold a doozy or something.

    Now for the journalling to begin.......